Go to Home Page
Books Authors Community News Links  
  Book Search by: 
 

So you're into sci fi? But what about sci fact? Sometimes fact is stranger than fiction...

Each month our very own Voyager Science Queen* will bring you interesting, quirky and downright bizarre tid bits from the world of science. And its all completely, totally, 100% true!

August Sci-Facts

Bits and Bobs

At the moment, the scientific community is aflame with new discoveries: discoveries such as Teleportation, Organ Replacement and Gene Research. But, even though the average Joe has a good basic understanding of the general research, I find that there are some glaring deficiencies in some of the popular beliefs that underpin these scientific principles. And, generally, these discoveries are viewed with some suspicion as your average human being loathes change…even if the changes are beneficial. I believe that these misgivings are generated by the 'jargon' that most scientists use. So, this month, I am going to spend a little time explaining two of the better-known misconceptions or obtuse terms.

Evolution

Let's bite the bullet with one of the most overused words in the English language; it's right up there with the word 'extreme' for popularity.
As a Zoologist, I am often amused with the blithe frequency that the word is tossed into any topic. Fashion is 'evolving'. Popular Music is 'evolving'. Even the stock market has its 'evolutionary' trends. Evolution has come to mean any form of growth or expansion, though not necessarily a maturing, of just about anything. This is part of the evolution of modern languages (sorry, I just couldn't resist the irony of the concept).

Evolution, in biological use of the term, is about how life forms change to suit their environment. Charles Darwin never used the phrase 'survival of the fittest' in his original book; some clever journalist coined the phrase when discussing theory. For some reason, it seems that most people feel that the animals 'know' what they are trying to evolve into…like the ancestor of the giraffe said, "Hey, I'm going to grow a long neck so that I can eat the leaves of trees instead of grass". This is not the case.

Most species go through a process of winnowing the weak or ill, due to predation or environmental factors. For example, say you have a tribe of people living next to a cliff. People who sleep walk will tend to die off more quickly than the sound sleepers. Over a long period of time, the sound sleepers will live longer, breed long and supply more offspring to the population. Eventually, the tribe will consist of people who stay in their own beds, with only the rare occurrence of a sleepwalker occurring. The tribe has evolved away from the original stock.
This does not necessarily mean that the sound sleepers are the 'fittest' individuals in the population, only that they are the best suited to the environmental conditions. Say that a new factor arises; such as vicious nocturnal predators start to frequently attack the tribe. The sound sleepers might not wake up quickly enough to run away from the threat…but the restless sleepwalkers are already on their feet and get away. Over time, the evolutionary selection would be against sound sleepers, as they no longer have the best fit for the environmental 'niche'.

No one individual feature can be declared beneficial or otherwise. In some human populations, there are people who suffer from various types of anaemia. These people generally die young, and yet they usually persist in large numbers within these populations. This is because their affliction affords them some protection from malaria and/or other blood diseases. When there is an epidemic of malaria, these people may be the only ones who survive to produce offspring in any number. And so, evolution is 'selecting' for the survivors, those individuals within a species that will help the species persist, even if it means that the end result might be very different to the ancestral stock.
This is very simplistic explanation of a very complicated topic. For further reading, I would suggest starting with the original book, "The Origin of the Species" by Charles Darwin, and then reading any high school biology book to fill in the details, as Darwin didn't or couldn't explain all of his concepts: such as what causes the variations within a population. And, for those people who don't believe in evolution, for whatever reason, please do not write to me to complain about this topic; please notice that I have not discounted any other theories, I have just offered an explanation of this one.

Schrödinger's Cat

One of the most well known concepts in physics is "Schrödinger's Cat". For some reason, the whole idea of the cruelty to cats attracts and captures the imagination. A lot of the time, no one seems to really know what the whole thing is about, except it involves putting some poor kitty into a box with a jar of poison & a trigger, involving radioactive isotopes, that will release the poison at some random moment.
Schrödinger was attempting to explain the fallacies that can lie in the incorrect use of statistics, particularly in relation to physics. He knew that numbers could be twisted to mean just about anything, and people with a weak grasp of the mathematics behind a real-life concept might get it wrong. And he used the 'the cat in the box' as a metaphor to prove this.

Simply, the cat in the box can be dead or alive…it can't be half dead. But, statistically, there is a fifty percent chance of the cat dying after a certain period of time. And, if you are confused about the issue, you might incorrectly say that the cat is 'half' alive and 'half' dead'. In reality, you would have to observe the cat to know for sure. Schrödinger was trying to explain the various 'states' of quantum wave functions in real terms, not using the fuzzy logic of incorrectly applied statistics.

For fun and yet informative further insights into Schrödinger's concept, try "The Science of Discworld" by Terry Pratchett, pages 94 & 95.

***

I hope this clears up some of the fog surrounding these terms. Scientists do not mean to be deliberately obtuse; it's just that they can forget that not everyone knows what an isotope is, or what parts make up a cell, and other information that they confront on a daily basis.



*The Voyager Science Queen is also known as Lynne Green

So, who is this woman who attempts to entertain us with Science?

Well, I really am a scientist. I have a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Queensland, in Zoology. And, at the moment, I am working in a Pathology laboratory.

I have always been intensely curious about every aspect of our universe, from the teeny tiny workings of the gene right up to the mind-bending forces that are twisting and knotting inside a blackhole. So, now I am sharing a brain stuffed full of trivia…and hopefully entertaining people at the same time.

As well, I write Fantasy stories and novels. One day, I hope to have a book published, but don't hold your breath. Reading is my other major love, and my favourite authors are Terry Pratchett and Isaac Asimov, though I could list hundreds of others. If I had one wish, I ask for more time to write!

Read previous Sci-Facts:

Australian Achievements
Getting Your Attention
May Sci-Facts
After the Big Bang
The Big Bang
Ashes to ashes; Dust to dust
Twists in the tale
Robots in the Swim and other things
The Tachyon and other things

Looking for more scientific oddities? Have you checked out Dr Steven Juan's website? He is, quite literally, the wizard of odds!



Home | Books | Authors | Community | News | Contact us | FAQ | Sitemap

Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2003 HarperCollinsPublishers Australia. All rights reserved.